Exploring participation in co-curricular activities among undergraduate students

Hilda Mary Mulrooney

Abstract


Co-curricular activities offer an opportunity for students to develop and demonstrate employability skills. Not all students take advantage of activities on offer, while others undertake multiple activities. In this study, second and third year students from two related undergraduate degree courses who had and had not taken up co-curricular activities identified their reasons for participating or not, and completed two questionnaires exploring their motivation (Academic Motivation Scale, AMS and Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire, MSLQ). First year students identified which activities they would be interested in participating in in future years, and why. Clear differences in participation between the two degree courses were seen, with significantly higher levels of intrinsic motivation among students who participated. Among those who did participate compared with those who did not, significant differences in different types of motivation were seen. Self-efficacy was also significantly higher in those who did, compared with those who did not, participate, although whether this is a cause or a consequence of participation is unclear. First year students indicated interest in a range of co-curricular activities, for personal as well as academic reasons. Further work is needed to ensure that all students understand the relevance and importance of co-curricular activities.

Key words: co-curricular, real-life learning, employability skills


Keywords


Co-curricular; real-life learning; employability skills

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andrews, M. (2013) Why our students need co-curricular, not extra-curricular, activities. Retrieved from The Guardian website: http://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/blog/2013/jan/22/student-development-university-curriculum-design

Artino, A.R. (2012) Academic self-efficacy: from educational theory to instructional practice. Perspect. Med. Educ. 1:76–85. DOI: 10.1007/s40037-012-0012-5.

Bandura, A. (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol. Rev. 84:191–215.

https://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Bandura/Bandura1977PR.pdf

Bandura, A. (1997) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

Barry, K. & King, L. (2000) Beginning Teaching and Beyond (3rd edn). Katoomba, NSW: Social Science Press.

Brown, J.S., Collins, A. & Deguid, P. (1989) Situated cognition of learning. Educ. Res. 18: 32-42.

http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-189X%28198901%2F02%2918%3A1%3C32%3ASCATCO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-2

Deci, E.L. & Ryan, R.M. (1985) Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.

Deci, E.L., Vallerand, R.J., Pelletier, L.G. & Ryan, R. (1991) Motivation and education: the self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4): 325-346. DOI: 10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_6

Deci, E.L., Koestner, R. & Ryan, R.M. (1999) A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6): 627-668.

DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627

Duncan, T.G. & McKeachie, W.J. (2010) The making of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Educational Psychologist 40(2): 117–128. DOI: 10.1207/s15326985ep4002_6

Gottfried, A.E., Fleming, J. & Gottfried, A.W. (2001) Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: a longitudinal study. J. Educational Psychologist, 93(1): 3-13. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.3

Higher Education Academy (HEA, 2015) Relevant Knowledge Hub Content. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/co-curricular-activities

Higher Education Council for England (HEFCE, 2011) Opportunity, choice and excellence in higher education. Bristol: HEFCE. http://www.hestem.ac.uk/sites/default/files/hefce_opportunity_choice_and_excellence_in_higher_education.pdf

Knowles, M.S., Holton, E.F. III & Swanson, R.A. (2005). The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.

Kolb, D.A. (1984) Experiential learning. Prentice-Hall: New Jersey, USA.

Kusarkar, R., Croiset, G., Kruitwagen, C. & ten Cate, O. (2010) Validity evidence for the measurement of the strength of motivation for medical school. Adv in Health Sci Educ. DOI: 10.1007/s/10459-010-9253-4.

Pegg, A., Waldock, J., Hendy-Isaac, S. & Lawton, R. (2012) Pedagogy for employability. York: HEA.

file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/pedagogy_for_employability_update_2012%20(1).pdf

Pew, S. (2007) Andragogy and Pedagogy as Foundational Theory for Student Motivation in Higher Education. Insight Student Motivation, 2: 14-25.

http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ864274.pdf

Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T. & McKeachie, W.J. (1991) A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Technical Report No. 91-B-004. University of Michigan; U.S. Dept. of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Educational Resources Information Center Ann Arbor, Mich.: [Washington, DC].

http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED338122.pdf

Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Duncan, T. & McKeachie, W.F. (1993) Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educ. Psychol. Meas., 53: 801-813 DOI: 10.1177/0013164493053003024.

Rachal, J.R. (2002) Andragogy’s detectives: A critique of the present and proposal for the future. Adult Education Quarterly, 52(3): 210-27. http://www.uwyo.edu/aded5050/5050unit10/andragog.pdf

Ryan, R.M. & Deci, E.L. (2000) Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25: 54–67. DOI:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

Schunk, D., Pintrich, P. & Meece, J. (2002) Motivation in Education: Theory, research and applications (3rd edn). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Merrill.

Sternberg, R.J. & Williams, W.M. (2002) Educational Psychology. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Valerio, K.M. (2012) Intrinsic motivation in the classroom. Journal of Student Engagement: Education Matters, 2 (1): 30–35. http://ro.uow.edu.au/jseem/vol2/iss1/6?utm_source=ro.uow.edu.au%2Fjseem%2Fvol2%2Fiss1%2F6&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages

Vallerand, R.J., Pelletier, L.G., Blais, M.R., Briere, N.M., Senecal, C. & Vallieres, E.F. (1992) The Academic Motivation Scale: a measure of intrinsic, extrinsic and amotivation in education. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 52: 1003-1017. DOI: 10.1177/0013164492052004025

Williams, K.C. & Williams, C.C. (2011) Five key ingredients for improving student motivation. Research in Higher Education Journal, 11:

http://www.aabri.comwww.aabri.com/manuscripts/11834.pdf

Winter, J., Sjerps-Jones, H., Dexter, B. & Klaff, J. (2012) Informal learning for sustainability. In: Putting the ‘S’ into ED: Education for Sustainable Development in Educational Development. D. Cotton, S. Sterling, V. Neal and J. Winter (Eds) London: SEDA special.

Winter, J., Sterling, S. & Cotton, D. (2015) 7 Steps to: Embedding Sustainability into Student Learning. Education Development, Plymouth University.

https://www.plymouth.ac.uk/uploads/production/document/path/3/3409/595997_261396_7_Steps_to_Embedding_Sustainability_into_Student_Learning_1214_BOLD.pdf




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29311/ndtps.v0i12.566

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences

eISSN: 2051-3615